Maitra came to mindfulness as a result of her philosophy research, and she’s exploring it further through her current work—a monograph on the epistemology of mindfulness.
“If you cultivate the virtue of, say, curiosity, does that really then impact the kinds of knowledge claims and theories you’re going to make?” she asks, in explaining her view that the nature of the “knower” is an important factor in understanding the nature of knowledge.
“What I’m saying is that in order to be a responsible, curious, open-minded ‘knower,’ it might be very important for us to develop certain skill-sets where we are not aiming for the content of our knowledge, but to cultivate the tone of our consciousness. It’s not all about what it is that we know, but the kind of sensibility and the ability to anchor the mind,” said Maitra.
“The case I am making is that the ability to know our mind, not just our unconscious mind—Freud did that—but even our relationship to our conscious mind can benefit from the skills,” Maitra said, describing mindfulness skills to be “the ability to be present, to be non-judgmental, to listen with your whole being—these are abilities that are habits of mind, habits of engagement.”
Read Keya Maitra's full interview here.
Wood takes mindfulness into field anthropology, which entails studying and understanding a culture through a first-person presence. But one’s very presence as an academic observer in another culture can change what one is observing. So when Wood studied the way of life of a community of north African nomads, he didn’t just visit, he lived there (to get a sense of his experiences and learning there, read his haunting novel, The Names of Things). But he still faced the challenge of understanding people in their own context, rather than through the built-in lens of his own cultural experiences and views. So for Wood, Zen Buddhist meditation and anthropology fit well together.
“Part of why I think it makes people better anthropologists is that it trains people to forget themselves. In doing anthropology, you’re trying to understand people on their terms and one has to be very conscious of and in tune with one’s own baggage in order to do that. … You become a better anthropologist by being more aware of where one’s ego is and where one’s ego ends. The Zen practice as I understand it is not about erasing ego because we can’t do that, but we can learn to check it and be aware of it and learn to still it in some ways so we can be truly present in the moment, instead of being with our ego, our baggage, our concepts.”
However, he acknowledges the inherent paradox about this approach, particularly when teaching Zen Anthropology and even in the certificate program. “Part of the practice is to be less concerned about adding to one’s distinction. The credentialing, and I participate in it—Zen Anthropology is part of it—runs a little counter to what ‘sitting’ [seated meditation] is about. … I’m kind of a black sheep in some ways about some of this activity on campus. I’m all for it but with caveats.”
Read John Wood's full interview here.